Tilbage til Advanced (Grades 10-12) English (UK) – Conversation

The Benefits and Risks of the Internet

Engelsk tale scenarie

Libby

A bright British English speaker with an approachable, conversational tone.

32 years · female

Practise talking about "The Benefits and Risks of the Internet" with Libby, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your Trinity GESE Grade 10-12 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Samtale

What makes the benefits and risks of the internet an important subject to discuss?

Godt svar:

I think the internet is important to discuss because it has become ordinary infrastructure rather than a separate part of life. People use it to study, work, shop, organise friendships, find news and express opinions. That creates real opportunity, especially for people who would otherwise be isolated or ignored. At the same time, the internet can quietly shape what people notice, believe and expect from themselves. Algorithms, mobile phones and instant convenience are not neutral background tools. They influence habits and relationships. The issue matters because individual choice is mixed with powerful systems that most users do not fully understand.

How has this issue changed in recent years?

Godt svar:

The internet has changed from something people visited to something they carry all day. That has made the benefits faster and the risks more constant. In the past, you might go online at a desk for a particular task. Now messages, news, work and entertainment follow people through their phones. The consequence is that attention has become harder to protect. People can be informed and connected, but also interrupted and compared with others almost continuously. I think the main change is not only speed. It is that online life has become woven into ordinary habits, even when people are not consciously choosing it.

Do you think people usually discuss this issue in a fair way?

Godt svar:

Honestly, I think the debate is often one-sided, because it often swings between panic and celebration. Some people talk as if the internet has ruined attention, privacy and truth. Others talk as if every criticism is just fear of progress. Both positions miss the mixture of benefits and harms in ordinary life. A student using free online lessons and a child being pushed harmful content are not separate debates; they are part of the same system. A fair discussion would look at design, incentives and regulation, not only at whether individual users make good choices under pressure from their devices.

What would be a sensible way for society to respond?

Godt svar:

A sensible response would combine digital education with stronger responsibility for platforms. Schools can teach students how to check sources, manage privacy and understand algorithms, but education cannot carry the whole burden. Platforms should also be required to make risks clearer and to limit designs that exploit attention, especially for children. The benefit would be more realistic protection. The possible downside is that regulation can be clumsy or politically abused. That is why rules should focus on transparency, safety and user control rather than giving governments broad power over speech or private opinion. That distinction matters, especially in democracies today.

How might your view change in the future?

Godt svar:

My view could change if there were strong evidence that regulation was doing more harm than good. I support rules around transparency and safety, but if those rules mainly protected large companies, reduced free expression or made useful services harder to access, I would have to reconsider. I would also look at evidence from different countries, because internet policy can sound good in theory and fail in practice. My current view is that personal responsibility and public rules are both needed, but the exact balance should depend on results, not just intentions or political slogans about freedom or safety online.