Tilbage til ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Responding to AI Use in Coursework

Engelsk tale scenarie

Sonia

A composed British English speaker with a professional, reassuring style.

41 years · female

Practise talking about "Responding to AI Use in Coursework" with Sonia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Samtale

We need to work together on this situation: a college needs rules for students using AI tools in coursework. What would you like to ask me first?

Godt svar:

My first question would be about evidence, not preferences. In this situation, a college needs rules for students using AI tools in coursework. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address technology and education in practice.

One possible response is strict limits with clear penalties. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Godt svar:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Strict limits with clear penalties could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is allowed use with disclosure and process evidence. How would you compare the two options?

Godt svar:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Strict limits with clear penalties seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while allowed use with disclosure and process evidence may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Godt svar:

I would not try to win the discussion by repeating my preference. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For responding to ai use in coursework, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Godt svar:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose allowed use with disclosure and process evidence if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.