Retour à ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Choosing a Media Literacy Campaign

Scénario d'expression orale en Anglais

Libby

A bright British English speaker with an approachable, conversational tone.

32 years · female

Practise talking about "Choosing a Media Literacy Campaign" with Libby, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Conversation

We need to work together on this situation: a city wants to reduce the spread of misleading local news online. What would you like to ask me first?

Bonne réponse:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, a city wants to reduce the spread of misleading local news online. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address the media in practice.

One possible response is public workshops on checking sources. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Bonne réponse:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Public workshops on checking sources could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is improving media literacy for confident students while missing those most easily influenced. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is a youth-led fact-checking channel. How would you compare the two options?

Bonne réponse:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Public workshops on checking sources seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while a youth-led fact-checking channel may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Bonne réponse:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For choosing a media literacy campaign, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Bonne réponse:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose a youth-led fact-checking channel if it deals better with improving media literacy for confident students while missing those most easily influenced, but I would keep one practical strength from public workshops on checking sources. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.