Choosing a Response to Deepfake Images
Scénario d'expression orale en Anglais

Ryan
A steady British English speaker with a practical, direct tone.
Practise talking about "Choosing a Response to Deepfake Images" with Ryan, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.
Start free AI practiceConversation
We need to work together on this situation: a school discovers harmful deepfake images have been shared online. What would you like to ask me first?
Bonne réponse:
My first question would be about evidence, not preferences. In this situation, a school discovers harmful deepfake images have been shared online. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address media and rights in practice.
One possible response is strong disciplinary and legal reporting. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?
Bonne réponse:
That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Strong disciplinary and legal reporting could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.
Another option is education about consent, image abuse and digital evidence. How would you compare the two options?
Bonne réponse:
I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Strong disciplinary and legal reporting seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while education about consent, image abuse and digital evidence may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.
Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?
Bonne réponse:
I would not try to win the discussion by repeating my preference. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For choosing a response to deepfake images, that extra link would make the point more precise.
What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?
Bonne réponse:
My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose education about consent, image abuse and digital evidence if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.