חזרה ל Advanced (Grades 10-12) English (UK) – Discussion of Presentation

How Technology Is Changing Human Relationships

אַנגְלִית תרחיש מדבר

Ollie

A friendly British English speaker with a clear, encouraging manner.

36 years · male

Practise talking about "How Technology Is Changing Human Relationships" with Ollie, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your Trinity GESE Grade 10-12 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

שִׂיחָה

Summarise the main argument of your presentation on how technology is changing human relationships.

תשובה טובה:

I would argue in the presentation that technology has not simply made relationships weaker or stronger; it has changed the conditions under which trust and attention are built. Phones, messaging apps and social media help people stay connected across distance, but they can also make relationships feel interrupted, performed or constantly available. I would focus on that tension. The issue deserves attention because relationships are not a private luxury. They affect mental health, family life, friendship, education and work. My main claim would be that technology becomes harmful when convenience replaces presence, but useful when it supports genuine communication. That distinction would guide the whole presentation.

What evidence or experience would you use to support that argument?

תשובה טובה:

I would draw on evidence about screen time, loneliness, online communication and young people's mental health, but I would handle it carefully. A study may show correlation between heavy social media use and anxiety, but that does not prove simple cause and effect. Lonely people may use technology more, rather than technology always making people lonely. I would combine research with examples such as group chats, video calls and online dating, because those show how technology feels in ordinary life. The evidence would support a cautious argument, not a dramatic claim that technology is destroying relationships. I would make that limitation clear to avoid overstating the research.

What is the strongest objection someone might make to your position?

תשובה טובה:

A serious objection is that technology is not the real problem; people's habits are. A critic could say that phones do not force anyone to ignore a friend, compare themselves with others or send careless messages. I would accept that personal responsibility matters. However, I would respond that platforms are designed to capture attention and encourage frequent checking. That design changes the environment in which relationships happen. My argument would not remove individual responsibility, but it would say that choices are shaped by systems that profit from distraction. I would still argue that design choices make some habits more likely than others.

How would your argument change if you looked at it from another country or generation?

תשובה טובה:

From another generation's perspective, the argument might sound very different. Older people may compare digital relationships with letters, landlines or unplanned visits, so they may notice the loss of patience and privacy more strongly. Younger people may see online life as part of ordinary friendship, not as a separate world. In another country, the issue might depend on migration, censorship, internet access or family expectations. I would not change the whole argument, but I would be more careful about assuming that one style of communication counts as normal. Context would therefore change the emotional force of the evidence and the examples I choose.

What final question would you want your audience to keep thinking about?

תשובה טובה:

I would close by asking whether we are using technology to give relationships more attention, or to make them easier to manage with less attention. That question remains unresolved because convenience is not always bad. Busy people need quick messages, shared calendars and remote contact. But if convenience becomes the main value, relationships may become thinner. I would want the audience to keep thinking about whether their own digital habits help them listen better, remember people better and show care more reliably, or whether they mainly reduce the effort relationships require. It would turn the ending back towards everyday behaviour.