חזרה ל ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Making Public Transport Fairer

אַנגְלִית תרחיש מדבר

Ethan

A clear British English speaker with a steady, encouraging style.

33 years · male

Practise talking about "Making Public Transport Fairer" with Ethan, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

שִׂיחָה

We need to work together on this situation: transport fares are rising and low-paid workers are most affected. What would you like to ask me first?

תשובה טובה:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, transport fares are rising and low-paid workers are most affected. I would ask who is most affected among workers, transport companies, employers, students and councils, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address economic issues in practice.

One possible response is discounted passes for low-income passengers. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

תשובה טובה:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Discounted passes for low-income passengers could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is helping the easiest group to reach while leaving the main barrier in place. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is employer contributions for essential workers. How would you compare the two options?

תשובה טובה:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Discounted passes for low-income passengers seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while employer contributions for essential workers may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

תשובה טובה:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For making public transport fairer, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

תשובה טובה:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose employer contributions for essential workers if it deals better with helping the easiest group to reach while leaving the main barrier in place, but I would keep one practical strength from discounted passes for low-income passengers. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.