Kembali ke ISE IV English (UK) – Interactive task

Algorithmic Welfare Decisions

Bahasa Inggris skenario berbicara

Ada

A calm British English speaker with a warm, focused manner.

34 years · female

Practise talking about "Algorithmic Welfare Decisions" with Ada, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE IV English – Interactive task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Percakapan

I am going to give you a situation. A government agency wants to use an algorithm to flag welfare claims for review. You need to ask questions and then tell me what you think should happen. What do you need to know first?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would need to know where the power sits before giving a view. In this case, a government agency wants to use an algorithm to flag welfare claims for review. I would ask who benefits immediately, who bears the risk if the judgement is wrong, and whether affected people can appeal or demand reasons. Without those answers, the proposal may sound efficient while concealing the risk of technical convenience hiding unequal power.

The main options are rapid automation to reduce fraud and delay or slower human review with transparent appeal rights. What assumption behind these options would you challenge?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would challenge the assumption that rapid automation to reduce fraud and delay and slower human review with transparent appeal rights are the only realistic moral choices. They may be useful starting points, but the real decision may require a narrower pilot, a stronger appeal route or a different definition of success. Otherwise we may choose between two polished versions of the same blind spot.

Suppose someone says your approach is too cautious and that urgent action is needed. How would you respond?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would accept the urgency, but separate urgency from certainty. I would allow action where the current harm is clear, but I would limit scale, publish reasons and set a review date. That responds to pressure without pretending the risk has disappeared, especially when the policy could lead to the risk of technical convenience hiding unequal power.

What long-term consequence worries you most if this decision is handled badly?

Jawaban yang bagus:

The long-term risk that worries me most is institutional habit. Once organisations build procedures around a decision, reversing it becomes expensive, embarrassing and politically difficult. In algorithmic welfare decisions, the risk of technical convenience hiding unequal power could start to feel normal rather than exceptional, which is more damaging than a single poor decision.

Where should responsibility sit: individuals, institutions, markets or government?

Jawaban yang bagus:

Responsibility should follow power, information and capacity. Government should set enforceable limits, institutions should explain and monitor decisions, and private actors should not profit from risks they do not carry. Individuals need voice, but voice is not a substitute for power or an appeal mechanism.

After hearing the objections, what final position would you take?

Jawaban yang bagus:

My final position would be conditional rather than absolute. I would not give a pure yes or no answer. I would allow the least irreversible action that addresses the immediate harm, but only with published reasons, independent review and a real route for people to challenge outcomes that affect them.