Kembali ke ISE IV English (UK) – Interactive task

Civil Disobedience in Climate Protest

Bahasa Inggris skenario berbicara

Alfie

A relaxed British English speaker with an easy, informal style.

31 years · male

Practise talking about "Civil Disobedience in Climate Protest" with Alfie, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE IV English – Interactive task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Percakapan

I am going to give you a situation. Activists block major roads to force stronger climate action. You need to ask questions and then tell me what you think should happen. What do you need to know first?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would need to know where the power sits before giving a view. In this case, activists block major roads to force stronger climate action. I would ask who benefits immediately, who bears the risk if the judgement is wrong, and whether affected people can appeal or demand reasons. Without those answers, the proposal may sound efficient while concealing the risk of public order being protected at the cost of legitimate dissent.

The main options are strict penalties for disruptive protest or protected space for disruption when democratic channels fail. What assumption behind these options would you challenge?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would be wary of the idea that strict penalties for disruptive protest and protected space for disruption when democratic channels fail are the only realistic moral choices. They may be useful starting points, but the real decision may require a narrower pilot, a stronger appeal route or a different definition of success. Otherwise we may choose between two polished versions of the same blind spot.

Suppose someone says your approach is too cautious and that urgent action is needed. How would you respond?

Jawaban yang bagus:

My response would be that urgent action still needs limits. I would allow action where the current harm is clear, but I would limit scale, publish reasons and set a review date. That responds to pressure without pretending the risk has disappeared, especially when the policy could lead to the risk of public order being protected at the cost of legitimate dissent.

What long-term consequence worries you most if this decision is handled badly?

Jawaban yang bagus:

The long-term risk that worries me most is institutional habit. Once organisations build procedures around a decision, reversing it becomes expensive, embarrassing and politically difficult. In civil disobedience in climate protest, the risk of public order being protected at the cost of legitimate dissent could start to feel normal rather than exceptional, which is more damaging than a single poor decision.

Where should responsibility sit: individuals, institutions, markets or government?

Jawaban yang bagus:

The public may have a stake, but institutions need explicit duties. Government should set enforceable limits, institutions should explain and monitor decisions, and private actors should not profit from risks they do not carry. Individuals need voice, but voice is not a substitute for power or an appeal mechanism. For civil disobedience in climate protest, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.

After hearing the objections, what final position would you take?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would take a staged position. I would not give a pure yes or no answer. I would allow the least irreversible action that addresses the immediate harm, but only with published reasons, independent review and a real route for people to challenge outcomes that affect them. For civil disobedience in climate protest, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.