Kembali ke ISE IV English (UK) – Interactive task

Banning Children From Social Media

Bahasa Inggris skenario berbicara

Ollie

A friendly British English speaker with a clear, encouraging manner.

36 years · male

Practise talking about "Banning Children From Social Media" with Ollie, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE IV English – Interactive task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Percakapan

I am going to give you a situation. Lawmakers propose banning under-16s from social media platforms. You need to ask questions and then tell me what you think should happen. What do you need to know first?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would need to know where the power sits before giving a view. In this case, lawmakers propose banning under-16s from social media platforms. I would ask who benefits immediately, who bears the risk if the judgement is wrong, and whether affected people can appeal or demand reasons. Without those answers, the proposal may sound efficient while concealing the risk of children being protected in a way that removes their voice.

The main options are a legal age ban with verification or design duties that make platforms safer for young users. What assumption behind these options would you challenge?

Jawaban yang bagus:

The weakest assumption, in my view, is that a legal age ban with verification and design duties that make platforms safer for young users are the only realistic moral choices. They may be useful starting points, but the real decision may require a narrower pilot, a stronger appeal route or a different definition of success. Otherwise we may choose between two polished versions of the same blind spot.

Suppose someone says your approach is too cautious and that urgent action is needed. How would you respond?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would concede that waiting for perfect evidence is not responsible either. I would allow action where the current harm is clear, but I would limit scale, publish reasons and set a review date. That responds to pressure without pretending the risk has disappeared, especially when the policy could lead to the risk of children being protected in a way that removes their voice.

What long-term consequence worries you most if this decision is handled badly?

Jawaban yang bagus:

The long-term risk that worries me most is institutional habit. Once organisations build procedures around a decision, reversing it becomes expensive, embarrassing and politically difficult. In banning children from social media, the risk of children being protected in a way that removes their voice could start to feel normal rather than exceptional, which is more damaging than a single poor decision.

Where should responsibility sit: individuals, institutions, markets or government?

Jawaban yang bagus:

I would separate moral responsibility from operational responsibility. Government should set enforceable limits, institutions should explain and monitor decisions, and private actors should not profit from risks they do not carry. Individuals need voice, but voice is not a substitute for power or an appeal mechanism. For banning children from social media, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.

After hearing the objections, what final position would you take?

Jawaban yang bagus:

My final answer would depend on whether the safeguards are enforceable. I would not give a pure yes or no answer. I would allow the least irreversible action that addresses the immediate harm, but only with published reasons, independent review and a real route for people to challenge outcomes that affect them. For banning children from social media, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.