戻る TOEFL Speaking B2 (4.0-4.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Handling a Group Member Who Does Not Help

英語スピーキングシナリオ

Abbi

An upbeat British English speaker with a clear, supportive delivery.

29 years · female

Practise talking about "Handling a Group Member Who Does Not Help" with Abbi, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT B2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

会話

What should a group do if one member is not helping?

グループのメンバーの1人が協力してくれない場合、グループはどうすればいいですか？

良い答えです:

The group should first check whether the member understands their task. Sometimes a student does not help because the role was never explained clearly, or the task is too vague. Before assuming the worst, the group can ask what the student thinks they are responsible for and what support they need. This keeps the conversation practical. If the problem is confusion, the group can rewrite the task, set a smaller deadline, and give the student a realistic chance to contribute. This approach avoids treating a planning failure as a character problem. It also gives the student a fair opportunity to correct the problem.

まずグループは、メンバーが自分の役割を理解しているかどうかを確認するべきです。役割の説明が不十分だったり、課題があいまいすぎたりすると、学生が協力しないことがあります。最悪の事態を決めつける前に、その学生が自分の担当をどう理解しているか、どんな支援が必要かを聞いてみるとよいでしょう。そうすれば、話し合いを現実的に進められます。原因が混乱にあるなら、グループは課題を言い直し、締め切りを短く設定し直し、その学生が実際に貢献できるようにすることができます。この方法なら、計画の失敗を性格の問題として扱わずに済みます。また、学生に問題を正すための公平な機会も与えられます。

Why is this problem difficult to discuss directly?

良い答えです:

This problem is difficult to discuss directly because students do not want to create conflict with someone they still have to work with. The relationship matters until the project ends, and a tense atmosphere can make meetings uncomfortable. Students may worry that the conversation will damage the group more than the missing work. However, avoiding the issue can create resentment. The challenge is to talk about the task and deadline, not attack the person. That makes the conversation easier to manage. A calm tone matters because the group still needs cooperation after the conversation. This is difficult, but silence usually creates more resentment than a careful conversation.

Is it better to speak to the student first or tell the teacher?

良い答えです:

It is usually better to speak to the student first because the problem may be easy to fix. Going straight to the teacher can seem unfair if the student did not realise the group was unhappy or misunderstood the task. A direct conversation gives them a chance to explain and improve. However, the conversation should be clear, not vague. The group should say what is missing and agree on a specific next step. If that step is not completed, involving the teacher becomes more reasonable. The group should also agree how they will check whether the problem has improved. That check should happen soon enough to protect the group’s timeline.

How can groups prevent this problem before the work begins?

良い答えです:

Groups can prevent the problem by agreeing on roles, deadlines, and communication rules at the beginning. Written expectations make later conversations less personal because the group can refer back to the plan. For example, if everyone agreed that sources should be uploaded by Friday, it is easier to discuss a missing section calmly. Clear roles also reduce the chance that two people do the same task while another person does nothing. Prevention begins with making responsibility visible before problems appear. Written expectations also help quiet students raise problems without sounding accusatory. The plan should be simple enough that every member can remember it.