戻る TOEFL Speaking C1 (5.0-5.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Planning a Sustainable Campus Event

英語スピーキングシナリオ

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Planning a Sustainable Campus Event" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C1 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

会話

What makes a campus event genuinely sustainable?

キャンパスイベントを本当に持続可能なものにするには、何が必要でしょうか？

良い答えです:

A genuinely sustainable campus event considers the whole process, not just one visible feature. Reusable cups are useful, but they mean little if food waste, travel emissions and energy use are ignored. Organisers need to think about suppliers, venue choice, transport, waste, accessibility and what happens after the event ends. For example, a conference might reduce printed materials but still create unnecessary emissions if everyone is encouraged to travel individually by car. Sustainability should therefore be built into the planning stage, not added as decoration near the end. A genuine plan looks at the event as a system. It asks where the largest impacts are, not only which green features will be most visible. That prevents symbolic gestures from replacing real environmental decisions.

本当に持続可能なキャンパスイベントは、目に見える一つの工夫だけでなく、全体の流れを考えて計画します。再利用できるカップは便利ですが、食品ロス、移動による排出、エネルギーの使い方が無視されていては、あまり意味がありません。主催者は、仕入れ先、会場の選び方、交通手段、廃棄物、アクセシビリティ、そしてイベント終了後に何が起こるかまで考える必要があります。たとえば、会議で印刷物を減らしても、参加者全員に車で個別に来るよう勧めてしまえば、不要な排出が増えるかもしれません。だからこそ、持続可能性は最後に飾りとして加えるのではなく、企画の段階から組み込むべきです。本当に良い計画は、イベントを一つのシステムとして見ます。どの環境配慮がいちばん目立つかではなく、どこに最も大きな影響があるのかを考えます。そうすることで、見せかけだけの取り組みが、本当に必要な環境面の判断に取って代わるのを防げます。

Why do sustainable plans sometimes fail during real events?

良い答えです:

Sustainable plans sometimes fail because they depend on behaviour that has not been made easy. If compost bins look similar to general waste bins, or volunteers are not trained to answer questions, participants will usually default to familiar habits. That does not necessarily mean students are careless. It means the system was not designed well enough for real conditions. During an event, people are talking, eating, moving between activities and making quick decisions. A sustainable plan has to work in that environment. Clear signs, convenient locations and prepared volunteers can make a large difference. The problem is often not the intention of the plan, but the gap between intention and practical execution. Real events expose weaknesses that planning documents can hide.

Should organisers prioritise environmental impact or student participation?

良い答えです:

Organisers should not treat environmental impact and student participation as complete opposites. The best plan reduces harm while making sustainable choices convenient enough that students still want to take part. For example, an event can provide good food, clear transport information and attractive activities while still reducing waste and avoiding unnecessary energy use. If sustainability is presented as inconvenience, participation may fall and the event may fail to influence behaviour. But if it is designed well, students can experience sustainability as normal rather than restrictive. I would therefore prioritise both aims together. The question should be how to make lower-impact participation easy, not which value to sacrifice immediately. That is a design challenge, not just a moral choice for organisers.

How could students measure whether a campus event was sustainable?

良い答えです:

Students could measure waste, energy use, travel choices and leftover food, then compare the results with a previous event or with a clear target. Measurement needs a baseline, otherwise sustainability becomes just a good impression. For example, organisers could record how many bags of general waste were produced, how much food was left over and what proportion of participants used public transport. They could also estimate whether reusable materials actually replaced disposable ones, rather than being added on top. The figures do not have to be perfect to be useful. They need to be consistent enough to show whether the event improved and where the biggest problems remained. Even rough measurement is better than relying on impressions after the event.