戻る TOEFL Speaking C2 (6.0) English (US) – Take an Interview

Connecting a University with Its Local Community

英語スピーキングシナリオ

Ada

A calm British English speaker with a warm, focused manner.

34 years · female

Practise talking about "Connecting a University with Its Local Community" with Ada, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

会話

Why should a university care about its local community?

大学は、なぜ地域社会のことを気にかけるべきなのでしょうか？

良い答えです:

A university should care because it affects housing, employment, transport and cultural life around it. It is not separate from its community; it changes the community by existing there. A growing campus can bring jobs, public events and research expertise, but it can also increase rents, reshape neighborhoods and put pressure on local services. If the university ignores those effects, it treats the surrounding area as a background rather than a partner. Caring about the local community is therefore not a charitable extra. It is part of institutional responsibility. The university benefits from the place's infrastructure, labor and identity, so it should ask how its success affects the people who live nearby. Local trust becomes part of its real license to operate.

大学がこの問題を気にかけるべきなのは、周辺の住まい、雇用、交通、文化的な暮らしに影響するからです。大学は地域から切り離された存在ではありません。そこにあるだけで、地域を変えていきます。キャンパスが拡大すれば、雇用や公開イベント、研究の知見をもたらす一方で、家賃の上昇、街並みの変化、地域サービスへの負担増につながることもあります。大学がそうした影響を無視すれば、周辺地域を協力相手ではなく、ただの背景として扱っていることになります。だからこそ、地域社会を大切にすることは、単なる善意の上乗せではありません。それは大学の責任の一部です。大学は、その土地のインフラ、労働力、そして地域としての個性の恩恵を受けているのですから、自分たちの成功が近くに住む人々にどう影響するのかを考えるべきです。地域からの信頼は、大学が実際に活動を続けるための正当性の一部にもなります。

What tension can exist between local responsibility and global ambition?

良い答えです:

Global ambition can pull attention toward international rankings, research prestige and elite partnerships, while local responsibility asks what the university owes to nearby residents. The tension appears when success is measured by distant audiences rather than local consequences. A university may invest heavily in global branding while local schools, transport systems or housing markets absorb the pressure of its expansion. That does not mean global ambition is wrong. International research and recruitment can bring enormous value. But if local impact is treated as secondary, the university may become celebrated elsewhere while losing legitimacy at home. A serious institution needs a strategy that connects global reach with local accountability. Otherwise ambition begins to look like escape from local obligations and responsibilities.

How would you respond to someone who says universities should focus only on research and students?

良い答えです:

Research and students are central, but they do not exist in a vacuum. Local relationships can support both by creating placements, research questions and public trust. For example, students in education, health, law or environmental science may learn through carefully designed local partnerships, while researchers may identify questions that matter because residents experience them directly. I would agree that a university should not lose sight of its academic mission. However, engagement with the local community can strengthen that mission when it is serious and reciprocal. The question is not whether universities should stop doing research or teaching. It is whether those activities should be isolated from the place that helps make them possible. Academic focus can include responsibility for context.

What should universities avoid when building relationships with local communities?

良い答えです:

Universities should avoid extractive partnerships, where the community supplies data, stories or goodwill but receives little influence or benefit in return. This can happen when researchers enter a neighborhood, collect interviews, publish findings and then disappear without sharing results in a useful form. It can also happen when students use local organizations for placements while those organizations receive extra workload and little support. Serious partnership should involve shared questions, fair credit, practical benefit and long-term communication. Otherwise, engagement becomes another form of taking. Over time, extractive relationships damage trust and make communities less willing to collaborate, even when future projects are more sincere. Repairing that damage is much harder than preventing it through respectful design from the beginning of partnership.