戻る TOEFL Speaking C2 (6.0) English (US) – Take an Interview

Discussing Ethical Choices Across Subjects

英語スピーキングシナリオ

Sonia

A composed British English speaker with a professional, reassuring style.

41 years · female

Practise talking about "Discussing Ethical Choices Across Subjects" with Sonia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

会話

Why should ethical choices be discussed across different subjects?

なぜ、倫理的な選択については、さまざまな科目で話し合うべきなのでしょうか？

良い答えです:

Ethical choices should be discussed across subjects because every field creates consequences for people. Engineering, business, biology and computing all involve decisions that are not merely technical. An engineer chooses safety margins, a business graduate may design incentives, and a computer scientist may build systems that classify or exclude people. If students learn only the technical method, they may miss the human stakes of using it. Ethics should therefore appear where decisions are actually made, not as an abstract subject outside practice. The point is not to make every class philosophical. It is to show that professional competence includes responsibility for foreseeable effects. That responsibility is easier to learn when it is practised repeatedly in realistic disciplinary contexts and assessed work.

倫理的な選択は、どの分野でも人に影響を及ぼす結果を生むので、教科をまたいで議論されるべきです。工学、経営学、生物学、情報科学のいずれにも、単なる技術的な判断では済まない決定が含まれています。たとえば、技術者は安全率を選び、経営学を学んだ人はインセンティブを設計し、コンピュータ科学者は人を分類したり排除したりするシステムを作ることがあります。学生が技術的な方法だけを学んでも、それを使うことで人にどんな影響があるのかを見落としてしまうかもしれません。だからこそ、倫理は抽象的な別科目としてではなく、実際に判断が行われる場で扱われるべきです。大切なのは、すべての授業を哲学の授業にすることではありません。専門的な能力には、予見できる影響に対する責任も含まれるのだと示すことです。その責任は、現実に近い各分野の文脈や課題で繰り返し実践し、評価されることで、より学びやすくなります。

What is difficult about teaching ethics outside specialist courses?

良い答えです:

It is difficult because teachers may feel unprepared to handle moral disagreement outside their technical expertise. A lecturer in computing, finance or engineering may be confident explaining methods but less confident moderating arguments about harm, consent or fairness. The result can be that ethics is reduced to a brief warning or compliance checklist. For example, a data science course might tell students to avoid bias without giving them the tools to identify whose interests are represented in the data. That is safer for the teacher but weaker for learning. Teaching ethics across subjects requires support, because technical experts should not be expected to improvise moral pedagogy alone. Support makes the discussion more rigorous, not less disciplinary or academically serious for students.

How would you respond to someone who says ethics is too personal to teach?

良い答えです:

Ethics is personal in the sense that values matter, but it is not only personal. People can reason about consequences, fairness, duties and evidence together. A student may bring their own moral background to a question about medical consent or environmental harm, but that does not mean all answers are equally well reasoned. Universities can ask students to clarify assumptions, consider affected groups and test whether their principles are applied consistently. That is education, not intrusion into private belief. I would tell the person that ethical teaching should not demand identical values, but it can help students make moral judgments more explicit, more accountable and less impulsive. That is a legitimate academic aim across disciplines, especially in professional education and applied subjects today.

What should universities avoid when adding ethical discussion to many subjects?

良い答えです:

Universities should avoid adding ethics as decoration. If ethical questions appear only in the final week, students will see them as separate from the real subject. That can happen when a course adds a single lecture on responsibility after all the technical content has already been taught. The message is that ethics is an appendix, not part of professional judgment. A stronger design would connect ethical questions to core tasks: choosing evidence, designing systems, interpreting results or advising clients. Long term, decorative ethics creates a false sense of seriousness. Students learn the vocabulary of responsibility without learning how responsibility changes the way work is actually done. That can make ethics feel cosmetic rather than necessary to competent practice in the field.