돌아가기 ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Managing Competition for Housing

영어 말하기 시나리오

Ryan

A steady British English speaker with a practical, direct tone.

39 years · male

Practise talking about "Managing Competition for Housing" with Ryan, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

We need to work together on this situation: a city has too few affordable homes for students, workers and families. What would you like to ask me first?

좋은 답변:

I would start by checking whose experience is missing from the discussion. In this situation, a city has too few affordable homes for students, workers and families. I would ask who is most affected among tenants, landlords, universities, employers and councillors, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address society and living standards in practice.

One possible response is more purpose-built student housing. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

좋은 답변:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. More purpose-built student housing could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is stronger rules on short-term rentals. How would you compare the two options?

좋은 답변:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. More purpose-built student housing seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while stronger rules on short-term rentals may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

좋은 답변:

I would turn the disagreement into a design question. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For managing competition for housing, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

좋은 답변:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose stronger rules on short-term rentals if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.