돌아가기 ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Responding to Gender Stereotypes in Sport

영어 말하기 시나리오

Bella

A warm British English speaker with a gentle, attentive style.

30 years · female

Practise talking about "Responding to Gender Stereotypes in Sport" with Bella, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

We need to work together on this situation: a sports programme notices boys and girls choosing activities along old stereotypes. What would you like to ask me first?

좋은 답변:

I would start by checking whose experience is missing from the discussion. In this situation, a sports programme notices boys and girls choosing activities along old stereotypes. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address stereotypes in practice.

One possible response is mixed taster sessions for all sports. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

좋은 답변:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Mixed taster sessions for all sports could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is leaving the underlying bias untouched while appearing inclusive. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is role-model visits from athletes who challenge stereotypes. How would you compare the two options?

좋은 답변:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Mixed taster sessions for all sports seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while role-model visits from athletes who challenge stereotypes may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

좋은 답변:

I would turn the disagreement into a design question. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For responding to gender stereotypes in sport, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

좋은 답변:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose role-model visits from athletes who challenge stereotypes if it deals better with leaving the underlying bias untouched while appearing inclusive, but I would keep one practical strength from mixed taster sessions for all sports. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.