돌아가기 ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Choosing Role Models for a Mentoring Programme

영어 말하기 시나리오

Alfie

A relaxed British English speaker with an easy, informal style.

31 years · male

Practise talking about "Choosing Role Models for a Mentoring Programme" with Alfie, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

We need to work together on this situation: a charity wants mentors who can inspire teenagers without presenting fake perfection. What would you like to ask me first?

좋은 답변:

I would start by checking whose experience is missing from the discussion. In this situation, a charity wants mentors who can inspire teenagers without presenting fake perfection. I would ask who is most affected among teenagers, mentors, parents and youth workers, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address role models in practice.

One possible response is high-achieving public figures. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

좋은 답변:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. High-achieving public figures could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is promoting success in a way that creates pressure or unrealistic comparison. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is local adults with honest stories of failure and recovery. How would you compare the two options?

좋은 답변:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. High-achieving public figures seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while local adults with honest stories of failure and recovery may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

좋은 답변:

I would turn the disagreement into a design question. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For choosing role models for a mentoring programme, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

좋은 답변:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose local adults with honest stories of failure and recovery if it deals better with promoting success in a way that creates pressure or unrealistic comparison, but I would keep one practical strength from high-achieving public figures. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.