돌아가기 TOEFL Speaking B2 (4.0-4.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Deciding Whether Attendance Should Count

영어 말하기 시나리오

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Deciding Whether Attendance Should Count" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT B2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

Why do some courses count attendance?

왜 어떤 수업은 출석을 반영하나요?

좋은 답변:

Some courses count attendance because participation is part of the learning. In seminars, language classes, or discussion-based courses, students learn by exchanging ideas, asking questions, and responding to classmates. If many students are absent, the quality of the class changes for everyone, not only for the missing students. Attendance can therefore support the course design. It reminds students that learning is not always a private activity that can be replaced by reading slides later at home. This is why attendance marks are more convincing when students actively contribute during class. Students should see that the mark reflects shared work, not just the teacher checking names.

어떤 강의는 출석을 점수에 반영해요. 참여 자체가 학습의 일부이기 때문이에요. 세미나나 언어 수업, 토론 중심 강의에서는 학생들이 서로 의견을 나누고, 질문하고, 반응하면서 배워요. 학생들이 많이 빠지면, 빠진 학생들만이 아니라 모든 사람에게 수업의 질이 달라져요. 그래서 출석은 강의 설계를 뒷받침해 줄 수 있어요. 출석은 학습이 항상 집에서 나중에 슬라이드만 읽으면 대신할 수 있는 개인 활동이 아니라는 점도 알려 줘요. 그래서 학생들이 수업 시간에 적극적으로 참여할수록 출석 점수가 더 설득력 있게 느껴져요. 학생들은 그 점수가 단순히 선생님이 이름만 확인하는 게 아니라, 함께한 노력의 결과라는 걸 알아야 해요.

What problems can strict attendance rules create?

좋은 답변:

Strict attendance rules can be unfair to students with illness, caring responsibilities, disabilities, or unreliable transport. These students may lose marks even when they are trying to keep up with the course. A rule that looks simple on paper can affect students very differently in real life. For example, a commuter student may be late because of train cancellations, not lack of effort. Attendance policies should recognise genuine difficulties while still encouraging students to participate regularly when they can. A fair policy should include a process for explaining serious or repeated difficulties. Flexibility is especially important when the student can show they are still completing the work.

Should attendance affect grades, or should only performance matter?

좋은 답변:

I think performance should matter more, but attendance can count a little in classes where participation is central. The rule should match the course design. In a seminar or practical workshop, being present affects discussion, teamwork, and skill development. In that case, a small attendance or participation mark may be reasonable. However, it should not dominate the grade. Students should mainly be assessed on what they can understand, produce, explain, or apply, not simply on whether they were physically in the room. The weighting should be small enough that one difficult week does not damage the whole course result. That limit protects students from losing too many marks for circumstances beyond their control.

How could a course encourage attendance without being unfair?

좋은 답변:

A course could count participation tasks instead of simple presence. For example, students might submit a short discussion note, complete a group exercise, or answer a reflection question during class. This rewards students who engage, while still focusing on learning rather than seat time. It also gives teachers better evidence of participation. If a student misses class for a genuine reason, they might complete an alternative task. That approach encourages attendance without pretending that being present automatically means being involved. This kind of task also makes attendance feel purposeful rather than purely administrative. It also gives quieter students a structured way to show engagement.