돌아가기 TOEFL Speaking C1 (5.0-5.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Making Internships Easier to Access

영어 말하기 시나리오

Ethan

A clear British English speaker with a steady, encouraging style.

33 years · male

Practise talking about "Making Internships Easier to Access" with Ethan, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C1 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

Why are internships hard for some students to access?

왜 어떤 학생들은 인턴십 기회를 얻기 어려울까요?

좋은 답변:

Internships are hard to access because opportunities often depend on networks that students do not possess equally. A confident student with family contacts may hear about openings before others even know where to look, and they may also understand the informal language of applications. Another student with similar ability may rely only on public advertisements, which are more competitive and sometimes appear late. This is not just a matter of personal confidence. It reflects unequal access to information and advice. Internships are supposed to help students enter professional life, but if the first step already depends on professional connections, the system can reproduce the very inequality it should reduce. That makes access a fairness issue, not just a careers issue.

인턴십은 접근하기가 어렵습니다. 기회가 학생마다 똑같이 주어지지 않고, 종종 학생이 가진 인맥에 따라 달라지기 때문이에요. 자신감이 있고 가족 인맥이 있는 학생은 다른 학생들이 어디를 찾아봐야 할지도 알기 전에 채용 소식을 먼저 들을 수 있고, 지원서에 쓰이는 비공식적인 표현도 더 잘 이해할 수 있어요. 비슷한 역량을 가진 다른 학생은 공고를 통해서만 정보를 얻어야 하는데, 이런 공고는 경쟁이 더 치열하고 때로는 늦게 올라오기도 해요. 이건 단순히 개인의 자신감 문제만은 아니에요. 정보와 조언에 대한 접근이 공평하지 않다는 뜻이기도 해요. 인턴십은 학생들이 전문적인 사회생활로 들어가는 데 도움을 주기 위한 것이지만, 첫걸음부터 이미 전문적인 인맥에 달려 있다면 그 제도는 오히려 줄여야 할 불평등을 다시 만들어 낼 수 있어요. 그래서 인턴십 접근성은 진로 문제일 뿐 아니라 공정성의 문제이기도 해요.

What barriers matter most: money, confidence, contacts, or time?

좋은 답변:

Money is often the most concrete barrier because it determines whether a student can accept the opportunity at all. Confidence and contacts matter, but they cannot solve unpaid rent, travel costs or the loss of regular wages. A student may be able to write a strong application and still turn down the placement because it is unpaid for six weeks in another city. That kind of barrier is especially unfair because it is hidden behind the language of choice. The student appears to have declined an opportunity, but in practice the opportunity was not available on equal terms. Universities should take money seriously because it affects access before performance can even be judged. It is the barrier that turns possibility into reality or removes it.

Should universities prioritise paid internships over unpaid opportunities?

좋은 답변:

Universities should prioritise paid internships because unpaid work tends to favour students who already have financial support. If the university promotes unpaid opportunities as career development, it may unintentionally reward the students who can afford to work for free. That undermines the idea that internships should widen access to professional experience. Paid internships are not only fairer financially. They also make participation more realistic for students with rent, travel costs or family responsibilities. I would not say that every unpaid opportunity has no educational value, but universities should be cautious about endorsing them. Learning opportunities should not depend on whether a student can absorb a period without income. Paid options make participation more credible and more inclusive across the student body.

How could a university make internship access fairer?

좋은 답변:

A university could make internship access fairer by creating a transparent database with clear deadlines, pay information, selection criteria and contact details. That would reduce the advantage of private networks because students would not have to rely on family contacts or informal rumours to find opportunities. The database should also explain what level of experience is expected, since many students underestimate themselves when descriptions sound too professional. Transparency will not remove every barrier, but it makes the first stage more equal. It also allows the university to monitor which employers offer paid work, which sectors are underrepresented and where students are repeatedly unsuccessful. That evidence can guide better partnerships over time and reveal gaps in provision before another recruitment cycle begins.