돌아가기 TOEFL Speaking C1 (5.0-5.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Planning a Sustainable Campus Event

영어 말하기 시나리오

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Planning a Sustainable Campus Event" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C1 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

대화

What makes a campus event genuinely sustainable?

캠퍼스 행사를 진짜 지속 가능하게 만드는 요소는 무엇일까요?

좋은 답변:

A genuinely sustainable campus event considers the whole process, not just one visible feature. Reusable cups are useful, but they mean little if food waste, travel emissions and energy use are ignored. Organisers need to think about suppliers, venue choice, transport, waste, accessibility and what happens after the event ends. For example, a conference might reduce printed materials but still create unnecessary emissions if everyone is encouraged to travel individually by car. Sustainability should therefore be built into the planning stage, not added as decoration near the end. A genuine plan looks at the event as a system. It asks where the largest impacts are, not only which green features will be most visible. That prevents symbolic gestures from replacing real environmental decisions.

진정으로 지속 가능한 캠퍼스 행사는 눈에 보이는 한 가지 요소만이 아니라 전체 과정을 함께 고려해요. 재사용 컵은 유용하지만, 음식물 쓰레기, 이동으로 인한 배출, 에너지 사용을 무시한다면 그 의미가 크지 않아요. 주최 측은 공급업체, 장소 선택, 이동 수단, 폐기물, 접근성, 그리고 행사가 끝난 뒤에 무엇이 일어나는지도 생각해야 해요. 예를 들어, 한 컨퍼런스가 인쇄물을 줄이더라도 모두가 각자 차를 타고 오도록 권장하면 불필요한 배출이 생길 수 있어요. 그래서 지속 가능성은 마지막에 장식처럼 덧붙이는 게 아니라, 기획 단계부터 반영돼야 해요. 진정한 계획은 행사를 하나의 시스템으로 바라봐요. 어떤 친환경 요소가 가장 눈에 띌지보다, 어디에서 가장 큰 영향이 생기는지를 먼저 묻죠. 그래야 보여주기식 제스처가 실제 환경적 결정을 대신하는 일을 막을 수 있어요.

Why do sustainable plans sometimes fail during real events?

좋은 답변:

Sustainable plans sometimes fail because they depend on behaviour that has not been made easy. If compost bins look similar to general waste bins, or volunteers are not trained to answer questions, participants will usually default to familiar habits. That does not necessarily mean students are careless. It means the system was not designed well enough for real conditions. During an event, people are talking, eating, moving between activities and making quick decisions. A sustainable plan has to work in that environment. Clear signs, convenient locations and prepared volunteers can make a large difference. The problem is often not the intention of the plan, but the gap between intention and practical execution. Real events expose weaknesses that planning documents can hide.

Should organisers prioritise environmental impact or student participation?

좋은 답변:

Organisers should not treat environmental impact and student participation as complete opposites. The best plan reduces harm while making sustainable choices convenient enough that students still want to take part. For example, an event can provide good food, clear transport information and attractive activities while still reducing waste and avoiding unnecessary energy use. If sustainability is presented as inconvenience, participation may fall and the event may fail to influence behaviour. But if it is designed well, students can experience sustainability as normal rather than restrictive. I would therefore prioritise both aims together. The question should be how to make lower-impact participation easy, not which value to sacrifice immediately. That is a design challenge, not just a moral choice for organisers.

How could students measure whether a campus event was sustainable?

좋은 답변:

Students could measure waste, energy use, travel choices and leftover food, then compare the results with a previous event or with a clear target. Measurement needs a baseline, otherwise sustainability becomes just a good impression. For example, organisers could record how many bags of general waste were produced, how much food was left over and what proportion of participants used public transport. They could also estimate whether reusable materials actually replaced disposable ones, rather than being added on top. The figures do not have to be perfect to be useful. They need to be consistent enough to show whether the event improved and where the biggest problems remained. Even rough measurement is better than relying on impressions after the event.