Kembali ke Advanced (Grades 10-12) English (UK) – Conversation

What Should Schools Teach?

Inggeris senario bercakap

Sonia

A composed British English speaker with a professional, reassuring style.

41 years · female

Practise talking about "What Should Schools Teach?" with Sonia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your Trinity GESE Grade 10-12 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Perbualan

What makes what should schools teach? an important subject to discuss?

Jawapan yang baik:

I think the school curriculum matters because it quietly decides what young people are told counts as useful knowledge. If schools give almost all their attention to exams, students may leave with grades but little confidence about money, relationships, work or mental health. On the other hand, if schools focus only on life skills, students may miss the deeper knowledge that helps them understand history, science, literature and society. The question is not just personal preference. It affects equality, because families with more education can fill the gaps at home, while other students depend much more heavily on what school provides.

How has this issue changed in recent years?

Jawapan yang baik:

One major change is that schools are now expected to solve problems that used to be seen as family or community responsibilities. People ask schools to teach digital safety, mental health, financial literacy, citizenship, nutrition and sometimes even emotional resilience. Some of that is sensible, because modern life is complicated and not every family can provide the same support. But it also creates pressure. Teachers may feel they are being asked to repair society while still delivering exam results. The consequence is that curriculum debates are no longer only about subjects. They are also arguments about what adults owe children.

Do you think people usually discuss this issue in a fair way?

Jawapan yang baik:

I would not say the debate is always fair, because people often start from their own school experience and treat it as universal. Someone who succeeded through traditional academic subjects may assume that everyone else should follow the same path. Someone who felt damaged by exam pressure may want a much freer curriculum. Both views contain truth, but neither is enough. Students vary enormously in ability, background and ambition. A fair discussion would ask how different kinds of students are affected, not just which curriculum sounds impressive to adults who are already educated and confident from a distance outside school.

What would be a sensible way for society to respond?

Jawapan yang baik:

A sensible response would be to protect a strong academic core while giving students more explicit preparation for adult life. I would not replace maths, science, languages or literature with short practical courses, but I would make space for financial education, digital judgement, mental health and careers guidance. The benefit is that students leave school with both knowledge and practical confidence. The danger is tokenism. If these topics are squeezed into one-off lessons, they may become box-ticking exercises. Schools would need proper time, trained staff and clear aims, otherwise the curriculum just becomes longer, thinner and more confused for everyone.

How might your view change in the future?

Jawapan yang baik:

My view might change if there were strong evidence that practical life-skills lessons were reducing academic depth. I support a broader curriculum, but not if it leaves students with weaker reading, writing, numeracy or scientific understanding. I would want to see long-term evidence, not just student satisfaction immediately after a new course is introduced. I would also listen to teachers, because they can often see when a reform sounds attractive but fails in the classroom. My basic view is that schools need balance, but I could change my opinion about where that balance should sit in practice for students today.