Kembali ke ISE IV English (UK) – Interactive task

Data Sharing During a Health Crisis

Inggeris senario bercakap

Elliot

A thoughtful British English speaker with a measured, clear tone.

35 years · male

Practise talking about "Data Sharing During a Health Crisis" with Elliot, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE IV English – Interactive task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Perbualan

I am going to give you a situation. Authorities want to share private health data quickly during an outbreak. You need to ask questions and then tell me what you think should happen. What do you need to know first?

Jawapan yang baik:

I would need to know where the power sits before giving a view. In this case, authorities want to share private health data quickly during an outbreak. I would ask who benefits immediately, who bears the risk if the judgement is wrong, and whether affected people can appeal or demand reasons. Without those answers, the proposal may sound efficient while concealing the risk of health protection weakening consent and public trust.

The main options are temporary emergency data sharing or slower consent-based sharing with narrower access. What assumption behind these options would you challenge?

Jawapan yang baik:

I would challenge the assumption that temporary emergency data sharing and slower consent-based sharing with narrower access are the only realistic moral choices. They may be useful starting points, but the real decision may require a narrower pilot, a stronger appeal route or a different definition of success. Otherwise we may choose between two polished versions of the same blind spot.

Suppose someone says your approach is too cautious and that urgent action is needed. How would you respond?

Jawapan yang baik:

I would accept the urgency, but separate urgency from certainty. I would allow action where the current harm is clear, but I would limit scale, publish reasons and set a review date. That responds to pressure without pretending the risk has disappeared, especially when the policy could lead to the risk of health protection weakening consent and public trust.

What long-term consequence worries you most if this decision is handled badly?

Jawapan yang baik:

The long-term risk that worries me most is institutional habit. Once organisations build procedures around a decision, reversing it becomes expensive, embarrassing and politically difficult. In data sharing during a health crisis, the risk of health protection weakening consent and public trust could start to feel normal rather than exceptional, which is more damaging than a single poor decision.

Where should responsibility sit: individuals, institutions, markets or government?

Jawapan yang baik:

Responsibility should follow power, information and capacity. Government should set enforceable limits, institutions should explain and monitor decisions, and private actors should not profit from risks they do not carry. Individuals need voice, but voice is not a substitute for power or an appeal mechanism. For data sharing during a health crisis, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.

After hearing the objections, what final position would you take?

Jawapan yang baik:

My final position would be conditional rather than absolute. I would not give a pure yes or no answer. I would allow the least irreversible action that addresses the immediate harm, but only with published reasons, independent review and a real route for people to challenge outcomes that affect them. For data sharing during a health crisis, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.