Kembali ke TOEFL Speaking B2 (4.0-4.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Responding to Peer Feedback

Inggeris senario bercakap

Libby

A bright British English speaker with an approachable, conversational tone.

32 years · female

Practise talking about "Responding to Peer Feedback" with Libby, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT B2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Perbualan

Tell me about a time when feedback from another student was useful or difficult.

Ceritakan tentang satu masa apabila maklum balas daripada pelajar lain sangat membantu atau agak sukar untuk diterima.

Jawapan yang baik:

Peer feedback was useful for me when another student noticed that my introduction did not match my conclusion. I had changed my argument while writing, but I had forgotten to update the beginning. The comment was simple, but it helped me see the essay as a whole instead of separate paragraphs. After that, I rewrote the introduction and made the main point clearer. It showed me that classmates can notice problems a writer misses because they read the work with fresh eyes. Since then, I have paid more attention to whether each part of my writing supports the same argument.

Maklum balas daripada rakan sebaya sangat membantu saya apabila seorang pelajar lain menyedari bahawa pendahuluan saya tidak selaras dengan kesimpulan saya. Saya telah mengubah hujah saya semasa menulis, tetapi saya terlupa untuk mengemas kini bahagian awal. Komen itu ringkas, tetapi ia membantu saya melihat esei itu secara keseluruhan, bukan sebagai perenggan-perenggan yang berasingan. Selepas itu, saya menulis semula pendahuluan dan menjadikan idea utama lebih jelas. Ia menunjukkan kepada saya bahawa rakan sekelas boleh mengesan masalah yang terlepas pandang oleh penulis kerana mereka membaca hasil kerja itu dengan pandangan yang segar. Sejak itu, saya lebih memberi perhatian sama ada setiap bahagian penulisan saya menyokong hujah yang sama.

How should students decide which peer comments to use?

Jawapan yang baik:

Students should use peer comments that match the assignment aim and assessment criteria. A suggestion may sound interesting, but if it moves the work away from the task, it may not be a good change. For example, a classmate might suggest adding a personal story to an essay that needs evidence from research. The comment could improve style but weaken the argument. Students need to compare each suggestion with the instructions before accepting it. This approach keeps the student in control of the work while still taking feedback seriously. It also prevents them from changing useful sections only to please one reader.

Is peer feedback as valuable as teacher feedback?

Jawapan yang baik:

Teacher feedback is usually more reliable because teachers understand the grading criteria and the course goals. They can explain what affects marks and what level of work is expected. Peer feedback is still valuable because classmates can show how a normal reader reacts. If a classmate is confused, the final reader may be confused too. I would treat teacher feedback as more authoritative, but peer feedback as a useful test of clarity before submitting the work. In that way, classmates can help identify communication problems even when they cannot judge the grade perfectly. This is a practical benefit that teachers cannot always provide before the deadline.

What can teachers do to make peer feedback more helpful?

Jawapan yang baik:

Teachers can give students a short feedback form with questions about structure, evidence, clarity, and the assignment aim. This makes comments more specific and easier to use. Instead of saying "good" or "unclear," students might answer questions like, "What is the main argument?" or "Which example needs more explanation?" A form also keeps the feedback focused on learning goals. It helps students give useful advice even when they are not confident reviewers. A form can also make the activity less awkward because students know exactly what they are expected to discuss. It turns peer review into a guided task rather than an uncomfortable conversation.