Terug naar TOEFL Speaking B2 (4.0-4.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Responding to Peer Feedback

Engels sprekend scenario

Libby

A bright British English speaker with an approachable, conversational tone.

32 years · female

Practise talking about "Responding to Peer Feedback" with Libby, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT B2 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Gesprek

Tell me about a time when feedback from another student was useful or difficult.

Vertel me over een keer dat feedback van een andere student nuttig was of juist lastig.

Goed antwoord:

Peer feedback was useful for me when another student noticed that my introduction did not match my conclusion. I had changed my argument while writing, but I had forgotten to update the beginning. The comment was simple, but it helped me see the essay as a whole instead of separate paragraphs. After that, I rewrote the introduction and made the main point clearer. It showed me that classmates can notice problems a writer misses because they read the work with fresh eyes. Since then, I have paid more attention to whether each part of my writing supports the same argument.

Feedback van medestudenten was voor mij nuttig toen een andere student merkte dat mijn inleiding niet aansloot op mijn conclusie. Tijdens het schrijven had ik mijn argument aangepast, maar ik was vergeten het begin bij te werken. De opmerking was simpel, maar hielp me om het essay als geheel te zien in plaats van als losse alinea’s. Daarna heb ik de inleiding herschreven en het hoofdpunt duidelijker gemaakt. Het liet me zien dat klasgenoten problemen kunnen opmerken die een schrijver mist, omdat ze het werk met een frisse blik lezen. Sindsdien let ik er beter op of elk deel van mijn tekst hetzelfde argument ondersteunt.

How should students decide which peer comments to use?

Goed antwoord:

Students should use peer comments that match the assignment aim and assessment criteria. A suggestion may sound interesting, but if it moves the work away from the task, it may not be a good change. For example, a classmate might suggest adding a personal story to an essay that needs evidence from research. The comment could improve style but weaken the argument. Students need to compare each suggestion with the instructions before accepting it. This approach keeps the student in control of the work while still taking feedback seriously. It also prevents them from changing useful sections only to please one reader.

Is peer feedback as valuable as teacher feedback?

Goed antwoord:

Teacher feedback is usually more reliable because teachers understand the grading criteria and the course goals. They can explain what affects marks and what level of work is expected. Peer feedback is still valuable because classmates can show how a normal reader reacts. If a classmate is confused, the final reader may be confused too. I would treat teacher feedback as more authoritative, but peer feedback as a useful test of clarity before submitting the work. In that way, classmates can help identify communication problems even when they cannot judge the grade perfectly. This is a practical benefit that teachers cannot always provide before the deadline.

What can teachers do to make peer feedback more helpful?

Goed antwoord:

Teachers can give students a short feedback form with questions about structure, evidence, clarity, and the assignment aim. This makes comments more specific and easier to use. Instead of saying "good" or "unclear," students might answer questions like, "What is the main argument?" or "Which example needs more explanation?" A form also keeps the feedback focused on learning goals. It helps students give useful advice even when they are not confident reviewers. A form can also make the activity less awkward because students know exactly what they are expected to discuss. It turns peer review into a guided task rather than an uncomfortable conversation.