Voltar para Advanced (Grades 10-12) English (UK) – Conversation

The Future of the Planet

Inglês cenário de fala

Ethan

A clear British English speaker with a steady, encouraging style.

33 years · male

Practise talking about "The Future of the Planet" with Ethan, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your Trinity GESE Grade 10-12 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Conversa

What makes the future of the planet an important subject to discuss?

Boa resposta:

The future of the planet matters because environmental risk is not separate from ordinary life. Flooding, heat, food prices, energy bills and public transport all affect how people live, work and plan for the future. The issue is also deeply unfair. People who contributed least to environmental damage may suffer most from it, while people with money can often protect themselves more easily. That makes the subject moral as well as practical. It asks how responsibility should be shared between individuals, businesses, governments and generations, especially when today's comfort may create tomorrow's cost for people with less protection and fewer choices.

How has this issue changed in recent years?

Boa resposta:

The issue has changed because environmental risk now feels more present. In the past, many people thought of climate change or biodiversity loss as future problems, distant from daily life. Now extreme weather, flooding, energy prices and food insecurity make the connection harder to ignore. This has changed the tone of the debate. It is less theoretical and more urgent. The consequence is that people are asking not only what should happen in fifty years, but what should happen to homes, transport, farming and energy systems now, before damage becomes harder to reverse or insure affordably for communities and insurers.

Do you think people usually discuss this issue in a fair way?

Boa resposta:

I would say it is often unbalanced, because it often turns into a choice between personal blame and political blame. Some people tell individuals to change their habits, as if recycling or diet alone can solve the crisis. Others blame governments and companies so completely that personal choices seem irrelevant. Both views are incomplete. A fair discussion would ask what each level can actually control. It would also recognise that poorer households may have fewer green choices, even when they care deeply about the environment and future generations, but lack practical alternatives where they live or work every day locally.

What would be a sensible way for society to respond?

Boa resposta:

A sensible response would combine clear government policy with affordable choices for ordinary people. It is not enough to tell people to drive less if public transport is unreliable, or to heat homes differently if cleaner systems are too expensive. Governments should invest in transport, home insulation, renewable energy and flood protection, while making polluting options less attractive over time. The benefit is that environmental action becomes practical rather than symbolic. The risk is cost, so the transition has to protect poorer households instead of punishing them for problems they did not create or have the power to solve alone.

How might your view change in the future?

Boa resposta:

Strong evidence would shift my view, especially if it showed that a particular environmental policy was creating more unfairness than benefit. I support strong action, but not policies that simply make life harder for poorer people while leaving wealthier people almost untouched. I would want to see long-term evidence about emissions, costs, health and public trust. If a policy reduced pollution but destroyed confidence in environmental action, it might need redesigning. My basic view is that action is necessary, but the route matters because unfair transition can create resistance and delay when trust is low and costs are visible immediately to households and communities.