Вернуться к ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Funding Local Arts Fairly

Устный сценарий на Английский

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Funding Local Arts Fairly" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Беседа

We need to work together on this situation: a grant panel must choose how to fund arts projects with public money. What would you like to ask me first?

Хороший ответ:

I would start by checking whose experience is missing from the discussion. In this situation, a grant panel must choose how to fund arts projects with public money. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address the arts in practice.

One possible response is funding established organisations with proven quality. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Хороший ответ:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Funding established organisations with proven quality could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is funding visible projects while excluding less powerful artists or audiences. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is funding smaller community projects with new audiences. How would you compare the two options?

Хороший ответ:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Funding established organisations with proven quality seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while funding smaller community projects with new audiences may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Хороший ответ:

I would turn the disagreement into a design question. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For funding local arts fairly, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Хороший ответ:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose funding smaller community projects with new audiences if it deals better with funding visible projects while excluding less powerful artists or audiences, but I would keep one practical strength from funding established organisations with proven quality. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.