Вернуться к ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Handling Data in a Student Wellbeing Survey

Устный сценарий на Английский

Olivia

A polished British English speaker with a calm, precise tone.

37 years · female

Practise talking about "Handling Data in a Student Wellbeing Survey" with Olivia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Беседа

We need to work together on this situation: a school wants wellbeing survey data to identify students needing support. What would you like to ask me first?

Хороший ответ:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, a school wants wellbeing survey data to identify students needing support. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address rights and technology in practice.

One possible response is anonymous trend data for planning. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Хороший ответ:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Anonymous trend data for planning could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is named responses when serious concerns appear. How would you compare the two options?

Хороший ответ:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Anonymous trend data for planning seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while named responses when serious concerns appear may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Хороший ответ:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For handling data in a student wellbeing survey, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Хороший ответ:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose named responses when serious concerns appear if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.