Tillbaka till ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Improving Representation in Course Materials

Engelska talar scenario

Sonia

A composed British English speaker with a professional, reassuring style.

41 years · female

Practise talking about "Improving Representation in Course Materials" with Sonia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Konversation

We need to work together on this situation: students say course materials do not represent a wide enough range of lives. What would you like to ask me first?

Bra svar:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, students say course materials do not represent a wide enough range of lives. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address stereotypes and education in practice.

One possible response is reviewing texts and examples across subjects. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Bra svar:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Reviewing texts and examples across subjects could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is student panels suggesting supplementary material. How would you compare the two options?

Bra svar:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Reviewing texts and examples across subjects seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while student panels suggesting supplementary material may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Bra svar:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For improving representation in course materials, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Bra svar:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose student panels suggesting supplementary material if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.