กลับไปที่ Advanced (Grades 10-12) English (UK) – Discussion of Presentation

What Makes a Society Fair

ภาษาอังกฤษ สถานการณ์การพูด

Hollie

A lively British English speaker with a friendly, natural tone.

28 years · female

Practise talking about "What Makes a Society Fair" with Hollie, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your Trinity GESE Grade 10-12 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

การสนทนา

Summarise the main argument of your presentation on what makes a society fair.

คำตอบที่ดี:

I would begin from the claim that a fair society is not one where everyone receives exactly the same outcome, but one where people's chances are not decided too strongly by birth, wealth or background. I would argue that fairness needs both opportunity and protection. People should be able to benefit from effort and talent, but they should not be punished for circumstances they did not choose, such as poverty, disability, discrimination or poor schooling. The issue deserves serious attention because it affects trust. If people believe the system is fixed against them, they are less likely to accept rules, contribute to public life or feel responsible for others.

What evidence or experience would you use to support that argument?

คำตอบที่ดี:

One evidence base would concern education, income, health and social mobility. For example, if children's future earnings are strongly linked to their parents' income, that suggests opportunity is not as open as people may believe. I would also look at access to healthcare or housing, because fairness is not only about money. The limitation is that statistics can show patterns, but they cannot explain every individual life. Some people do overcome disadvantage, and some privileged people fail. I would use the evidence to discuss probabilities and barriers, not to deny personal agency. That would make the argument more careful and more credible.

What is the strongest objection someone might make to your position?

คำตอบที่ดี:

The most difficult objection would be that too much emphasis on equality can weaken responsibility. A critic might say that if society constantly explains disadvantage through systems, people may feel less accountable for their own choices. I would take that seriously, because fairness should not remove the idea of effort. My response would be that recognising barriers is not the same as denying responsibility. A fair society can expect people to contribute while still admitting that some obstacles are much heavier than others. The aim is not to guarantee identical lives. It is to make sure that responsibility is meaningful because people have real, not merely theoretical, options.

How would your argument change if you looked at it from another country or generation?

คำตอบที่ดี:

Considering another country would mean another country, I might weigh the evidence differently. In a country with very weak public services, fairness may first mean reliable schools, healthcare and legal protection. In a wealthy country, the debate may focus more on housing costs, inherited wealth, taxation and access to professional networks. Generations would also see the issue differently. Older people may emphasise discipline and self-reliance, especially if they experienced hardship. Younger people may focus on debt, insecure work and the feeling that traditional routes to stability are blocked. I would use those perspectives to make the presentation less abstract and more grounded.

What final question would you want your audience to keep thinking about?

คำตอบที่ดี:

I would leave the audience is: how much inequality can a society accept before opportunity stops being believable? That question remains unresolved because some inequality may reflect choice, effort or innovation, but too much inequality can close doors before people even begin. There is no exact number where fairness suddenly disappears. The answer depends on education, housing, health, political voice and whether people feel respected. I would end with that question because it avoids a simplistic demand for sameness. It asks instead whether people can genuinely imagine improving their lives through effort, or whether the structure around them has already decided too much.