Назад до ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Choosing a Campaign on Consumer Pressure

англійська сценарій розмови

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Choosing a Campaign on Consumer Pressure" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Розмова

We need to work together on this situation: a youth group wants to challenge pressure to buy products for status. What would you like to ask me first?

Хороша відповідь:

My first question would be about evidence, not preferences. In this situation, a youth group wants to challenge pressure to buy products for status. I would ask who is most affected among the people most affected, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address lifestyles and advertising in practice.

One possible response is media analysis workshops. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Хороша відповідь:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Media analysis workshops could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is missing the people most affected. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is student-created content about alternative values. How would you compare the two options?

Хороша відповідь:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Media analysis workshops seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while student-created content about alternative values may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Хороша відповідь:

I would not try to win the discussion by repeating my preference. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For choosing a campaign on consumer pressure, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Хороша відповідь:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose student-created content about alternative values if it deals better with missing the people most affected. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.