返回 ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Responding to Online Harassment

英语说话情景

Oliver

A composed British English speaker with a clear, professional style.

42 years · male

Practise talking about "Responding to Online Harassment" with Oliver, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

对话

We need to work together on this situation: students want stronger action against online harassment linked to school life. What would you like to ask me first?

好答案:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, students want stronger action against online harassment linked to school life. I would ask who is most affected among students, parents, teachers, platform staff and safeguarding teams, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address young people's rights in practice.

One possible response is clearer school reporting routes. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

好答案:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Clearer school reporting routes could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is protecting young people in a way that reduces their voice or trust. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is student-led norms for group chats and social platforms. How would you compare the two options?

好答案:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Clearer school reporting routes seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while student-led norms for group chats and social platforms may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

好答案:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction. For responding to online harassment, that extra link would make the point more precise.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

好答案:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose student-led norms for group chats and social platforms if it deals better with protecting young people in a way that reduces their voice or trust, but I would keep one practical strength from clearer school reporting routes. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.