返回 TOEFL Speaking C1 (5.0-5.5) English (US) – Take an Interview

Planning a Sustainable Campus Event

英语说话情景

Thomas

A confident British English speaker with a balanced, formal delivery.

44 years · male

Practise talking about "Planning a Sustainable Campus Event" with Thomas, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your TOEFL iBT C1 speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

对话

What makes a campus event genuinely sustainable?

是什么让一场校园活动真正做到可持续？

好答案:

A genuinely sustainable campus event considers the whole process, not just one visible feature. Reusable cups are useful, but they mean little if food waste, travel emissions and energy use are ignored. Organisers need to think about suppliers, venue choice, transport, waste, accessibility and what happens after the event ends. For example, a conference might reduce printed materials but still create unnecessary emissions if everyone is encouraged to travel individually by car. Sustainability should therefore be built into the planning stage, not added as decoration near the end. A genuine plan looks at the event as a system. It asks where the largest impacts are, not only which green features will be most visible. That prevents symbolic gestures from replacing real environmental decisions.

一个真正可持续的校园活动，考虑的是整个流程，而不只是某一个看得见的亮点。可重复使用的杯子当然有用，但如果忽视了食物浪费、出行排放和能源消耗，它们的意义就很有限。组织者需要考虑供应商、场地选择、交通、废弃物、无障碍安排，以及活动结束后会发生什么。比如，一场会议可能减少了印刷材料，但如果鼓励所有人各自开车前往，还是会产生不必要的排放。因此，可持续性应该从策划阶段就融入进去，而不是到最后才当作装饰加上去。真正的方案会把活动当成一个系统来看，关注最大的影响来自哪里，而不只是哪些绿色做法最显眼。这样才能避免用象征性的举动，取代真正的环保决策。

Why do sustainable plans sometimes fail during real events?

好答案:

Sustainable plans sometimes fail because they depend on behaviour that has not been made easy. If compost bins look similar to general waste bins, or volunteers are not trained to answer questions, participants will usually default to familiar habits. That does not necessarily mean students are careless. It means the system was not designed well enough for real conditions. During an event, people are talking, eating, moving between activities and making quick decisions. A sustainable plan has to work in that environment. Clear signs, convenient locations and prepared volunteers can make a large difference. The problem is often not the intention of the plan, but the gap between intention and practical execution. Real events expose weaknesses that planning documents can hide.

Should organisers prioritise environmental impact or student participation?

好答案:

Organisers should not treat environmental impact and student participation as complete opposites. The best plan reduces harm while making sustainable choices convenient enough that students still want to take part. For example, an event can provide good food, clear transport information and attractive activities while still reducing waste and avoiding unnecessary energy use. If sustainability is presented as inconvenience, participation may fall and the event may fail to influence behaviour. But if it is designed well, students can experience sustainability as normal rather than restrictive. I would therefore prioritise both aims together. The question should be how to make lower-impact participation easy, not which value to sacrifice immediately. That is a design challenge, not just a moral choice for organisers.

How could students measure whether a campus event was sustainable?

好答案:

Students could measure waste, energy use, travel choices and leftover food, then compare the results with a previous event or with a clear target. Measurement needs a baseline, otherwise sustainability becomes just a good impression. For example, organisers could record how many bags of general waste were produced, how much food was left over and what proportion of participants used public transport. They could also estimate whether reusable materials actually replaced disposable ones, rather than being added on top. The figures do not have to be perfect to be useful. They need to be consistent enough to show whether the event improved and where the biggest problems remained. Even rough measurement is better than relying on impressions after the event.