Înapoi la ISE III English (UK) – Collaborative task

Negotiating Privacy Rules for a Youth App

engleză scenariu vorbitor

Ada

A calm British English speaker with a warm, focused manner.

34 years · female

Practise talking about "Negotiating Privacy Rules for a Youth App" with Ada, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE III English – Collaborative task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Conversaţie

We need to work together on this situation: a youth organisation is designing an app for advice and peer support. What would you like to ask me first?

Bun răspuns:

Before choosing a solution, I would pin down the real problem. In this situation, a youth organisation is designing an app for advice and peer support. I would ask who is most affected among young users, parents, counsellors, developers and safeguarding leads, what has already been tried, and what constraint cannot be ignored. Without that, we might choose a neat solution that does not address young people's rights in practice.

One possible response is strong parental visibility for safety. What advantages and problems do you see with that idea?

Bun răspuns:

That option has a clear attraction, because people can understand it quickly. Strong parental visibility for safety could work if the main need is structure and quick implementation. My concern is protecting young people in a way that reduces their voice or trust. Before supporting it, I would ask who might avoid it, who pays for it and how we would know whether it improves the situation rather than just making action visible.

Another option is private access with clear emergency escalation. How would you compare the two options?

Bun răspuns:

I would compare them by asking which risk is more acceptable. Strong parental visibility for safety seems stronger where the problem needs clear rules, while private access with clear emergency escalation may be stronger where people need confidence, privacy or ownership. I would choose the option that is more likely to produce a fairer result in this situation.

Some people involved may disagree with your preferred option. How would you persuade them or adapt the plan?

Bun răspuns:

If people disagreed, I would ask which part of the plan they could not accept. If their concern was reasonable, I would change the plan rather than treat compromise as weakness. For example, we could pilot the option, publish the review criteria and agree in advance what evidence would make us change direction.

What final recommendation would you make, and what should happen next?

Bun răspuns:

My final recommendation would be conditional. I would probably choose private access with clear emergency escalation if it deals better with protecting young people in a way that reduces their voice or trust, but I would keep one practical strength from strong parental visibility for safety. Next, I would assign responsibility, consult the least heard group and set a short review against a fairer result in this situation.