Înapoi la ISE IV English (UK) – Interactive task

Rewilding Productive Farmland

engleză scenariu vorbitor

Sonia

A composed British English speaker with a professional, reassuring style.

41 years · female

Practise talking about "Rewilding Productive Farmland" with Sonia, your AI speaking avatar. Speak out loud, get instant feedback, and build confidence for your ISE IV English – Interactive task speaking exam.

Start free AI practice

Conversaţie

I am going to give you a situation. A region considers rewilding farmland to restore biodiversity. You need to ask questions and then tell me what you think should happen. What do you need to know first?

Bun răspuns:

I would need to know where the power sits before giving a view. In this case, a region considers rewilding farmland to restore biodiversity. I would ask who benefits immediately, who bears the risk if the judgement is wrong, and whether affected people can appeal or demand reasons. Without those answers, the proposal may sound efficient while concealing the risk of environmental goals being set without respecting livelihoods.

The main options are large-scale rewilding with compensation or mixed farming reforms that protect biodiversity while producing food. What assumption behind these options would you challenge?

Bun răspuns:

I would challenge the assumption that large-scale rewilding with compensation and mixed farming reforms that protect biodiversity while producing food are the only realistic moral choices. They may be useful starting points, but the real decision may require a narrower pilot, a stronger appeal route or a different definition of success. Otherwise we may choose between two polished versions of the same blind spot.

Suppose someone says your approach is too cautious and that urgent action is needed. How would you respond?

Bun răspuns:

I would accept the urgency, but separate urgency from certainty. I would allow action where the current harm is clear, but I would limit scale, publish reasons and set a review date. That responds to pressure without pretending the risk has disappeared, especially when the policy could lead to the risk of environmental goals being set without respecting livelihoods.

What long-term consequence worries you most if this decision is handled badly?

Bun răspuns:

The long-term risk that worries me most is institutional habit. Once organisations build procedures around a decision, reversing it becomes expensive, embarrassing and politically difficult. In rewilding productive farmland, the risk of environmental goals being set without respecting livelihoods could start to feel normal rather than exceptional, which is more damaging than a single poor decision.

Where should responsibility sit: individuals, institutions, markets or government?

Bun răspuns:

Responsibility should follow power, information and capacity. Government should set enforceable limits, institutions should explain and monitor decisions, and private actors should not profit from risks they do not carry. Individuals need voice, but voice is not a substitute for power or an appeal mechanism. For rewilding productive farmland, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.

After hearing the objections, what final position would you take?

Bun răspuns:

My final position would be conditional rather than absolute. I would not give a pure yes or no answer. I would allow the least irreversible action that addresses the immediate harm, but only with published reasons, independent review and a real route for people to challenge outcomes that affect them. For rewilding productive farmland, that qualification keeps the answer tied to the actual case.